Skip to main content

Fit Review Birkenstock Lugano Soft Footbed Suede & Gizeh Soft Footbed Nubuck Leather

Happy Monday! Today's post is a fit request from Cindy who wanted to see a review of the size differences between Birkenstock's Soft Footbed Medium./Narrow and Regular/Wide. I chose two different pairs that I was most interested in to try. 

For reference I typically wear size 5.5 in sneakers and I also wear size 5 in shoes/sandals.



This is the first time trying Birkenstock's Soft Footbed sandals and they feel like my other pair that I have from years ago. I can't say I really notice a difference in footbeds. Apparently the Soft Foodbed are made to feel as if you're walking barefoot in maximum comfort with an additional foam layer. (I got that off the website.) I didn't end up keeping either pair so I can't say if the comfort level is elevated. This is a fit review only.


The suede cross-straps are very soft, the footbed is also lined in suede. The woven straps have an adjustable strap with a buckle made of metal. I'm wearing size 35 EU or size 4-4.5. I don't consider myself to have narrow feet, but I also don't consider myself to have wide feet. 






How do they fit? The length fits well. There's a little extra room in the length so I would say Birkenstock's generally run a little large. The medium/narrow width is a bit too small on my foot. You can see in the photo below my foot hits the edge of the shoe and it was a bit uncomfortable. The correct sizing for me would me regular/wide. I do like the way the woven cross-straps look on my feet. If these came in regular/wide I would have kept them. 

Too narrow.

Regular Wide Size 35/4-4.5


The Gizeh is a really popular style from Birkenstock. I see them all the time. I ordered this pair in Old Rose to try in regular/wide size 35/4-4.5. The nubuck leather feels slightly stiff but should soften over time. The thong feels comfortable between my toes and my foot felt secure. The footbed is lined with suede.






The regular/wide width is much more comfortable. There is enough room on both sides of my foot. The length fit nicely, about felt the same as the Lugano sandal. I have the buckle at the smallest setting and it was a good fit. 



I did consider keeping these, but since the end of summer is here I decided to return them. I did find them on sale at Zappos for $101. They have size 36 and up if anyone feels like stocking up for next summer.


I'm a fan of Birkenstock and they are a little pricey but they are also high quality shoes. If you do find a pair that you like that fits well, it's probably worth keeping. I will be trying some fall shoes from Birkenstock over the next few weeks. Keep an eye out for more footwear reviews.


That's it for me! This is the last week of September, let's make it a good one!

Shop:






Comments

  1. Thank you so much for doing the fit review! I like the gizeh on you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They seem to be a perfect fit on you. The 34 kids you reviewed in the past seems a bit too small? Cindy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Cindy, yeah looking back at the photos, now they do look a smidge too small, but they didn't feel small.

      Delete
  3. I love the criss cross of the Lugano's. I've only ever tried on Birks. They look nice but feel super stiff and I don't wear sandals much and prefer sneakers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Janessa! The nubuck leather does feel stiff, but the suede was very soft! I prefer sneakers too.

      Delete
    2. The footbed of Birks are pretty stiff to begin with and take time to break in. And while they're not cushy like memory foam , When they do break in , the cork molds to your foot and feel like they were custom made for your feet. I wore mine around the house for a while then made sure i wore them out everytime I left the house during the break in process. One of the reasons I don't like wearing sandals is, my feet get dirty but for some reason , that doesn't happen with birks as much. That being said , not everyone's feet will work with Birks. My friend who is flat footed says they hurt her feet really badly. Anyway, I'm totally obsessed with them at the moment. Cindy

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review! Coach Soft Empire Carryall 40 Merlot

  I am super excited about this review! This has been the most anticipated Coach bag since The Rogue came out. At least for me. When I first saw this bag on the purseblog , my eyes widened and I was immediately obsessed. The Soft Empire Carryall comes in four sizes. Size 48 is ridiculously big, I cannot pull it off, but the 40? Perfect. Size 35 and 26 just doesn't give off the same wow factor. This bag is meant to be a statement piece and head turner. Kudos to Stewart Vevers for creating another hit that everyone will be obsessing over for a long time. I hear that more colors will be released soon, and I am hoping the distressed lived-in version will not be exclusive to size 48. In case it doesn't happen, I'll be using my Empire 40 as much as I can to give it a distressed look myself.  For reference I'm 4 feet 11 inches tall and please check out my video to see what fits! Coach Empire 40 Merlot This bag is huge, it's definitely the biggest bag in my collection. ...

Review! Balenciaga Rodeo Bag Size Small Plus Video

  You all know I love my bags, and as a Balenciaga collector, I don't often stray from the City and First style. The Rodeo (pronounced like Rodeo Drive) really caught my eye. It gives off a slouchy Hermes Kelly vibe, but way more practical to use.  For reference I'm 4 feet 11 inches tall. Balenciaga Rodeo Bag Small The Rodeo can be carried a few ways. It comes with a crossbody strap that is not adjustable but it is removable. Not sure why anyone wouldn't add a few extra holes to make a strap adjustable these days. Come on Balenciaga! Do better! The top handle is a bit too long for this to work anyhow, I feel like the top handle gets in the way. It sticks out and doesn't sit well in my opinion. I wouldn't carry this bag crossbody unless it was an unforeseen emergency and I really needed my hands free. This bag looks more chic carried by the handle or crook of the arm. It also looks nice left open with the help of the flap tucked in. The Rodeo resembles the Kelly bag ...

Review! Lululemon's Large Everywhere Belt Bag Size Comparison Plus Video!

  Happy Friday! I can't believe it's almost Halloween! I actually have a dentist appointment on Halloween. One of my molars chipped and needs to be filled in. It's a tiny chip that I didn't even notice until my dentist pointed it out to me during my last visit. I'm not looking forward to it at all since I will need local anesthesia. Anyway, today I have a belt bag size comparison review for you all! For reference I'm 4 feet 11 inches tall and typically wear size 4 in Lululemon tops and bottoms. From Top To Bottom: Everywhere Belt Bag Large  Gray Sage Everywhere Belt Bag  Deco Pink Mini Belt Bag  Brier Rose also wearing:  Scuba Oversized Full Zip Hoodie Natural Ivory Size XS/S Softstreme High Rise Straight Leg Crop True Navy Size 6 This is the Large Everywhere Belt Bag in Gray Sage. It's double the size of the regular Everywhere Belt Bag. There is also a $10 price difference between the two. I'm wearing the Scuba Oversized Full Zip and I feel like the b...